fix some naming convention issue
This commit is contained in:
parent
b43c14476b
commit
66e5dfecb5
1 changed files with 13 additions and 13 deletions
|
|
@ -113,23 +113,23 @@ public class ProcessTask implements ConsumerTask {
|
|||
*/
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public TaskResult call() {
|
||||
final MetricsScope scope_app = MetricsUtil.createMetricsWithOperation(metricsFactory, APPLICATION_LEVEL_METRICS);
|
||||
final MetricsScope scope_shard = MetricsUtil.createMetricsWithOperation(metricsFactory, PROCESS_TASK_OPERATION);
|
||||
final MetricsScope AppScope = MetricsUtil.createMetricsWithOperation(metricsFactory, APPLICATION_LEVEL_METRICS);
|
||||
final MetricsScope ShardScope = MetricsUtil.createMetricsWithOperation(metricsFactory, PROCESS_TASK_OPERATION);
|
||||
shardInfo.streamIdentifierSerOpt()
|
||||
.ifPresent(streamId -> MetricsUtil.addStreamId(scope_shard, StreamIdentifier.multiStreamInstance(streamId)));
|
||||
MetricsUtil.addShardId(scope_shard, shardInfo.shardId());
|
||||
.ifPresent(streamId -> MetricsUtil.addStreamId(ShardScope, StreamIdentifier.multiStreamInstance(streamId)));
|
||||
MetricsUtil.addShardId(ShardScope, shardInfo.shardId());
|
||||
long startTimeMillis = System.currentTimeMillis();
|
||||
boolean success = false;
|
||||
try {
|
||||
scope_shard.addData(RECORDS_PROCESSED_METRIC, 0, StandardUnit.COUNT, MetricsLevel.SUMMARY);
|
||||
scope_shard.addData(DATA_BYTES_PROCESSED_METRIC, 0, StandardUnit.BYTES, MetricsLevel.SUMMARY);
|
||||
ShardScope.addData(RECORDS_PROCESSED_METRIC, 0, StandardUnit.COUNT, MetricsLevel.SUMMARY);
|
||||
ShardScope.addData(DATA_BYTES_PROCESSED_METRIC, 0, StandardUnit.BYTES, MetricsLevel.SUMMARY);
|
||||
Exception exception = null;
|
||||
|
||||
try {
|
||||
if (processRecordsInput.millisBehindLatest() != null) {
|
||||
scope_shard.addData(MILLIS_BEHIND_LATEST_METRIC, processRecordsInput.millisBehindLatest(),
|
||||
ShardScope.addData(MILLIS_BEHIND_LATEST_METRIC, processRecordsInput.millisBehindLatest(),
|
||||
StandardUnit.MILLISECONDS, MetricsLevel.SUMMARY);
|
||||
scope_app.addData(MILLIS_BEHIND_LATEST_METRIC, processRecordsInput.millisBehindLatest(),
|
||||
AppScope.addData(MILLIS_BEHIND_LATEST_METRIC, processRecordsInput.millisBehindLatest(),
|
||||
StandardUnit.MILLISECONDS, MetricsLevel.SUMMARY);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -146,11 +146,11 @@ public class ProcessTask implements ConsumerTask {
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!records.isEmpty()) {
|
||||
scope_shard.addData(RECORDS_PROCESSED_METRIC, records.size(), StandardUnit.COUNT, MetricsLevel.SUMMARY);
|
||||
ShardScope.addData(RECORDS_PROCESSED_METRIC, records.size(), StandardUnit.COUNT, MetricsLevel.SUMMARY);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
recordProcessorCheckpointer.largestPermittedCheckpointValue(filterAndGetMaxExtendedSequenceNumber(
|
||||
scope_shard, records, recordProcessorCheckpointer.lastCheckpointValue(),
|
||||
ShardScope, records, recordProcessorCheckpointer.lastCheckpointValue(),
|
||||
recordProcessorCheckpointer.largestPermittedCheckpointValue()));
|
||||
|
||||
if (shouldCallProcessRecords(records)) {
|
||||
|
|
@ -169,9 +169,9 @@ public class ProcessTask implements ConsumerTask {
|
|||
}
|
||||
return new TaskResult(exception);
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
MetricsUtil.addSuccessAndLatency(scope_shard, success, startTimeMillis, MetricsLevel.SUMMARY);
|
||||
MetricsUtil.endScope(scope_shard);
|
||||
MetricsUtil.endScope(scope_app);
|
||||
MetricsUtil.addSuccessAndLatency(ShardScope, success, startTimeMillis, MetricsLevel.SUMMARY);
|
||||
MetricsUtil.endScope(ShardScope);
|
||||
MetricsUtil.endScope(AppScope);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue