From 3801c37f51777a0091cb8c365ea1604f98762ad0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Klishin Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 17:56:52 +0400 Subject: [PATCH] This section is about baseline performance and highly unscientific, too --- README.md | 11 +++++++---- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index c94fc35..e555466 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -107,10 +107,12 @@ Monger is part of the [group of Clojure libraries known as ClojureWerkz](http:// [Cassaforte](http://clojurecassandra.info), [Langohr](http://clojurerabbitmq.info), [Elastisch](http://clojureelasticsearch.info), [Titanium](http://titanium.clojurewerkz.org), [Quartzite](http://clojurequartz.info) and several others. -## Write Performance +## Baseline Performance -Monger insert operations are efficient and have very little overhead compared to the underlying Java driver. Here -are some (very unscientific) numbers on a MacBook Pro from fall 2010 with Core i7 and an Intel SSD drive: +Monger is efficient and has very little overhead +compared to the underlying Java driver. Here is one (very +unscientific) benchmark on a MacBook Pro from mid-2010 with Core i7 +and an Intel SSD drive: ``` Testing monger.test.stress @@ -122,7 +124,8 @@ Inserting 100000 documents... "Elapsed time: 515.969 msecs" ``` -With the `SAFE` write concern, it takes roughly 0.5 second to insert 100,000 documents with Clojure 1.3.0. +With the `SAFE` write concern, it takes roughly 0.5 second to insert +100,000 documents with Clojure 1.3.0.