From ae9c3438201e03e31c5d5df40e5a291eb11f4937 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Malchevskiy Misha Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 18:20:52 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Fix typo --- doc/differences-from-component.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/differences-from-component.md b/doc/differences-from-component.md index fe09dc0..de99577 100644 --- a/doc/differences-from-component.md +++ b/doc/differences-from-component.md @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ Mount allows adding `defstates` _incrementally_, the same way you would add func Component changes the way the code is structured. Depending on the size of the code base, and how rich the dependency graph is, Component might add a good amount of cognitive load. To a simple navigation from namespace to namespace, from function to function, Components add, well.. "Components" that can't be ignored when [loading the codebase in one's head](http://paulgraham.com/head.html) -Since Mount relies on Clojure namespaces (`:require`/`:use`), navigation accorss functions / states is exactly +Since Mount relies on Clojure namespaces (`:require`/`:use`), navigation across functions / states is exactly the same with or without Mount: there are no extra mental steps. ### Starting and stopping _parts_ of an application