# next.jdbc The next generation of `clojure.java.jdbc`: a new low-level Clojure wrapper for JDBC-based access to databases. ## TL;DR [](https://clojars.org/seancorfield/next.jdbc) * [Getting Started](https://github.com/seancorfield/next-jdbc/blob/master/doc/getting_started.md) * [Migrating from `clojure.java.jdbc`](https://github.com/seancorfield/next-jdbc/blob/master/doc/differences.md) * Feedback via [issues](https://github.com/seancorfield/next-jdbc/issues) or in the [`#sql` channel on the Clojurians Slack](https://clojurians.slack.com/messages/C1Q164V29/details/) or the [`#sql` stream on the Clojurians Zulip](https://clojurians.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/152063-sql). ## Motivation Why another JDBC library? Why a different API from `clojure.java.jdbc`? * Performance: there's a surprising amount of overhead in how `ResultSet` objects are converted to sequences of hash maps – which can be really noticeable for large result sets – so I want a better way to handle that. There's also quite a bit of overhead and complexity in all the conditional logic and parsing that is associated with `db-spec`-as-hash-map. * A more modern API, based on using qualified keywords and transducers etc: `:qualifier` and `reducible-query` in recent `clojure.java.jdbc` versions were steps toward that but there's a lot of "legacy" API in the library and I want to present a more focused, more streamlined API so folks naturally use the `IReduceInit` / transducer approach from day one and benefit from qualified keywords. * Simplicity: `clojure.java.jdbc` uses a variety of ways to execute SQL which can lead to inconsistencies and surprises – `query`, `execute!`, and `db-do-commands` are all different ways to execute different types of SQL statement so you have to remember which is which and you often have to watch out for restrictions in the underlying JDBC API. Those are my three primary drivers. In addition, the `db-spec`-as-hash-map approach in `clojure.java.jdbc` has caused a lot of frustration and confusion in the past, especially with the wide range of conflicting options that are supported. `next.jdbc` is heavily protocol-based so it's easier to mix'n'match how you use it with direct Java JDBC code (and the protocol-based approach contributes to the improved performance overall). There's a much clearer path of `db-spec` -> `DataSource` -> `Connection` now, which should steer people toward more connection reuse and better performing apps. I also wanted `datafy`/`nav` support baked right in (it was added to `clojure.java.jdbc` back in December 2018 as an undocumented, experimental API in a separate namespace). It is the default behavior for `execute!` and `execute!`. The protocol-based function `next.jdbc.result-set/datafiable-row` can be used with `reducible!` if you need to add `datafy`/`nav` support to rows you are creating in your reduction. At this point, I would consider the API to be fairly stable and [alpha builds are now available on Clojars](https://clojars.org/seancorfield/next.jdbc) (2019-04-20). The "syntactic sugar" SQL functions (`insert!`, `query`, `update!`, and `delete!`) go beyond what I wanted to include in the core API so they are in `next.jdbc.sql`. I know that their equivalents in `clojure.java.jdbc` are heavily used (based on the number of questions and JIRA issues I get). I am still [considering whether this should go into Contrib](https://github.com/seancorfield/next-jdbc/issues/3) as new namespaces in `clojure.java.jdbc` or whether it will continue to live standalone so I'm not accepting Pull Requests yet (but I can't disable them on GitHub!). There are pros and cons to both choices, in my mind. ## Usage The primary concepts behind `next.jdbc` are that you start by producing a `javax.sql.DataSource`. You can create a pooled datasource object using your preferred library (c3p0, hikari-cp, etc). You can use `next.jdbc`'s `get-datasource` function to create a `DataSource` from a `db-spec` hash map or from a JDBC URL (string). The underlying protocol, `Sourceable`, can be extended to allow more things to be turned into a `DataSource` (and can be extended via metadata on an object as well as via types). From a `DataSource`, either you or `next.jdbc` can create a `java.sql.Connection` via the `get-connection` function. You can specify an options hash map to `get-connection` to modify the connection that is created: `:read-only`, `:auto-commit`. The primary SQL execution API in `next.jdbc` is: * `reducible!` -- yields an `IReduceInit` that, when reduced, executes the SQL statement and then reduces over the `ResultSet` with as little overhead as possible. * `execute!` -- executes the SQL statement and produces a vector of realized hash maps, that use qualified keywords for the column names, of the form `: