luciano/reitit
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/metosin/reitit.git synced 2025-12-17 00:11:11 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

fix typo in doc

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Tommi Reiman 2017-11-01 09:36:06 +02:00
parent 1ccd93101c
commit 812ecbb993
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
doc/performance.md
View file

@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ The routing sample taken from [bide](https://github.com/funcool/bide) perf suite
### Is that good? ### Is that good?
Based on some [quick tests](https://github.com/metosin/reitit/tree/master/perf-test/clj/reitit), the first lookup is order of 100 times faster than other tested Clojure routing libraries. The second being 3-18x faster. But as like most microbenchmarks, test usually lie as they might test things with different libs. For example, Pedestal also matches on the `:request-method` which makes it do more work. With real life routing trees, the differences are most likely more subtle, or even the order might be totally different. Based on some [quick tests](https://github.com/metosin/reitit/tree/master/perf-test/clj/reitit), the first lookup is order of 100 times faster than other tested Clojure routing libraries. The second being 3-18x faster. But as like most microbenchmarks, test usually lie as they test different test things with different libs. For example, Pedestal also matches on the `:request-method` which makes it do more work. With real life routing trees, the differences are most likely more subtle, or even the order might be totally different.
### So why test? ### So why test?